Rome Through a Thriller Writer’s Eyes

A psychological thriller author reflects on Rome, from the Colosseum and Vatican to Ostia Antica, and the human secrets hidden in ruins, power and memory.

I had one of those rare weeks where I didn’t write.

fColosseum isfColosseumWe spent the week in Rome. Not a writing trip. No laptop. No word counts. No pretending I’d make a few notes and somehow end up with three thousand words before breakfast.

But writers don’t really switch off.

Especially not thriller writers.

Rome is beautiful, obviously. Grand. Ancient. Impressive in ways that make you feel small. But what struck me most wasn’t the beauty. It was the layers.

Every street seemed to have another history beneath it. Every ruin hinted at lives lived, deals made, lies told, reputations protected, and bodies forgotten. Rome doesn’t just show you power. It shows you what power leaves behind.

And as someone who writes psychological thrillers, I found myself thinking less about emperors and battles, more about people.

The private fears behind public faces.

The secrets families keep.

The gap between what someone appears to be and what they actually are.

In other words, exactly the stuff I’m always drawn back to./i

The Colosseum is one of those places that feels unreal even when you’re standing inside it.

I kept trying to imagine the crowd.

Not the gladiators in the arena. Not at first. The crowd.

Tens of thousands of ordinary people turning up to watch violence as entertainment. Families. Friends. Politicians. Merchants. Children. People who might have been kind to their neighbours in the morning and then cheered while strangers killed each other in the afternoon.

That’s the part that stayed with me.

How quickly terrible things become normal when everyone around you accepts them.

How a crowd gives people permission.

How easy it is to hide cruelty behind tradition, spectacle, or duty.

Thrillers often turn on one frightening idea: ordinary people are capable of more than they think. Rome gives you that on a grand scale. It asks uncomfortable questions about complicity. About what people will watch. About what they will excuse. About what they will tell themselves afterwards so they can sleep at night.

Cheery holiday thoughts, obviously.

The Forum gave me a different kind of unease.

It felt like walking through the remains of certainty.

Law courts. Temples. Political spaces. Monuments. Places where people once argued, judged, prayed, schemed, accused, defended, and decided the futures of others.

Now they’re ruins.

That gap fascinates me. The distance between what a place once claimed to be and what remains after time has stripped away the performance.

I kept thinking about reputation. How much effort people put into controlling the story told about them. How families, institutions, and governments build versions of themselves they want others to believe.

And how fragile all of that is.

A lie can last for years. Sometimes generations. But it only needs one person to ask the wrong question. One document in the wrong drawer. One witness who decides they’ve stayed silent long enough.

That’s where stories begin.

The Vatican Museum was a mixed experience.

As most of you know, I’m legally blind, and the Sistine Chapel’s lighting did me no favours. Much of the detail was lost on me. I couldn’t make out the imagery people travel across the world to see.

But I still got plenty from the place.

Not the detail. The atmosphere.

The scale. The wealth. The careful staging of sacred authority. The sense of an institution presenting itself exactly as it wishes to be seen.

That interests me as a thriller writer, because so many of these books are about image management.

The perfect marriage.

The respectable family.

The trusted professional.

The quiet neighbour.

The person who knows exactly what to show the world and exactly what to keep hidden.

The Vatican also made me think about contradiction. About the distance between belief and institution. Between humility and gold. Between what people say they stand for and what their buildings, clothes, rituals, and locked doors reveal.

That kind of contradiction is a gift for fiction.

Not because it gives easy answers, but because it creates tension. And tension is where character lives.

The Egyptian collection was a highlight, especially a statue of Anubis.

But my favourite part of the Vatican Museum wasn’t the Sistine Chapel.

It was the Popemobiles.

I genuinely loved them.

There’s a whole section showing papal transport through the ages, from golden carriages to modern vehicles with raised bulletproof platforms. A golden carriage tells you one thing about power. A bulletproof glass box tells you something else.

Both are public statements.

Both are protective.

Both create distance.

And that made me think about the ways people protect themselves. Not just physically, but emotionally. Socially. Psychologically. The armour people wear. The version of themselves they place between their real life and the watching crowd.

Sometimes that armour is status.

Sometimes it’s charm.

Sometimes it’s silence.

Sometimes it’s a lie repeated so often everyone in the family agrees to treat it as truth.

My favourite place on the whole trip was Ostia Antica, the old Roman port at the mouth of the Tiber.

I’d been to Pompeii before. Astonishing, but busy. Ostia Antica was quieter, which gave it a different feeling.

There was space to slow down.

Space to notice.

We walked through streets, bathhouses, courtyards, old living spaces. The amphitheatre felt almost modern in its layout. A strange thing to say about something two thousand years old, but you could see at once how people gathered there.

That’s what got to me most.

The ordinary lives.

Not the emperors. Not the grand history. The people who wanted somewhere to live, somewhere to wash, somewhere to eat, somewhere to be seen. People gossiping, working, praying, showing off, falling in love, falling out, betraying each other, forgiving each other, keeping things from each other.

All the usual human mess.

The past feels distant until you stand in someone’s old home and realise people haven’t changed as much as we like to think.

Different clothes. Different gods. Different laws.

Same shame. Same pride. Same desire to belong. Same fear of being found out.

The museum at Ostia Antica was wonderful and, thankfully, well-lit, so I could actually enjoy the exhibits.

A good sculpture shows you what someone looked like.

A great sculpture makes you wonder what they were hiding.

There were portraits, reliefs, sarcophagi, mythological figures. A statue of Minerva I keep thinking about a week later.

Portraits are strange things. They preserve a face, but not a life. You look at someone carved in stone and know almost nothing about them. Were they loved? Feared? Kind? Cruel? Faithful? Dangerous? Did their family mourn them honestly, or out of obligation? Did the inscription tell the truth?

Probably not all of it.

That’s the thing about monuments. They’re often less about memory than control. This is how we want this person remembered. This is what we agreed to say. This is the version that survives.

Every family has something similar.

Maybe not carved in marble.

But there are stories everyone repeats. Stories everyone avoids. Photographs no one mentions. Names that make the room go quiet. Old decisions softened into anecdotes because the truth would be too sharp.

That’s where psychological thrillers live.

Not always in murder, though murder does tend to focus the mind.

They live in pressure.

In silence.

In the moment someone realises the official version doesn’t quite fit.

So, no, I didn’t write while I was away.

But I came home with plenty.

Not plot ideas exactly. More like questions.

What do people hide in plain sight?

How does power protect itself?

What does a family choose to remember?

What does it choose to bury?

How much of a person can survive in the stories others tell about them?

Rome is full of ruins, but ruins aren’t dead places. They’re evidence. They show us what people built, what they valued, what they feared, and what they hoped would never be forgotten.

They also remind us that secrets rarely disappear.

They wait.

Under the floor.

Behind the wall.

In the locked room.

In the family story nobody questions anymore.

And then, one day, someone starts asking.

The Tension Between Truth and Perception in Modern Thrillers

How conflicting versions of events create suspense and intrigue in thrillers, with a look at truth, perception, and shifting narratives in My Daughter Knows.

One of the most powerful engines in any thriller is the gap between what actually happened and what people believe happened.

That gap creates space for doubt, for suspicion, and for the slow, uneasy feeling that something doesn’t quite add up.

In real life, most of us rely on agreed narratives. A thing happens, a version of it takes hold, and we move on.

In fiction, that’s where the story begins. Because once you start to look closely, those narratives often have edges that don’t quite fit. Details that were smoothed over. Questions that were never asked. Or answers that came too quickly.

In My Daughter Knows, that tension sits at the centre of the story. There is an official version of events—clear, simple, and repeated often enough that it feels solid. It’s the version that can be explained in interviews, summarised in headlines, and accepted without too much resistance.

But stories don’t stay contained, especially when more people begin to look at them from different angles.

As attention grows, so does interpretation. People bring their own perspectives, their own assumptions, their own curiosity. They ask questions not because they have answers, but because something feels unresolved.

And once those questions start to circulate, the original narrative begins to shift—not all at once, but in small, cumulative ways.

That’s where suspense lives.

It’s not always in a single shocking revelation, but in the gradual erosion of certainty. A comment that doesn’t quite match what’s been said before. A detail that takes on a different meaning when viewed from another perspective. A moment where a character realises that the version they’ve been holding onto might not be the only one.

What makes this especially compelling is that perception isn’t inherently unreliable, it’s human.

People don’t set out to misinterpret events. They build stories that make sense to them, based on what they know, what they’ve been told, and what they need to believe.

In a thriller, those personal versions of the truth can collide in ways that create tension without needing a traditional villain.

In My Daughter Knows, that collision happens across generations, across platforms, and across private and public spaces.

One version of events exists within the family, shaped by memory, emotion, and the need to cope. Another exists outside it, shaped by distance, observation, and the instinct to question.

Neither is complete. Neither is entirely stable.

The result is a constant sense of movement. The story isn’t just about uncovering what’s true—it’s about watching how truth is interpreted, challenged, and reshaped in real time.

Get your copy.

Mother–Daughter Relationships in Modern Thrillers: Conflict, Generations, and Emotional Stakes

A look at how mother–daughter relationships shape modern thrillers, exploring generational conflict, shifting values, and the tension between independence and protection.

Domestic thrillers have long leaned on marriages as their central fault line—husbands and wives circling each other, secrets buried in shared lives.

But increasingly, there’s something just as compelling in the space between mothers and daughters, particularly in a modern context where the gap between generations feels sharper than ever.

Part of that comes down to how quickly the world has changed. Many mothers in contemporary thrillers belong to that older millennial bracket—now in their forties—who remember life before the internet became constant. They adapted to it. They learned its rules. But they still carry a sense that the online world is something separate from “real life.”

Their daughters, especially those in the Gen Z bracket, have never known that separation. The internet isn’t an addition to life—it’s part of it. Identity, communication, validation, and even grief can all play out in public spaces.

That difference in perspective creates a natural, ongoing friction. It’s not just about behaviour—it’s about values. What should be private? What should be shared? What does safety even mean?

That tension becomes even more interesting when you place it at the heart of a thriller. Because thrillers thrive on information—who knows what, who controls it, and who reveals it.

A mother might instinctively try to contain a situation, to manage the narrative, to protect the family unit by limiting exposure. A daughter might do the opposite—sharing, questioning, pushing outward. Neither approach is inherently right or wrong, but the clash between them creates movement in the story.

There’s also the specific complexity of that age: eighteen. Legally an adult, but still in transition.

For a parent, that shift can feel abrupt. One day you’re responsible for every decision, the next you’re expected to step back while still carrying the same instinct to protect. That push and pull between authority and autonomy creates a constant negotiation in their relationship.

For the daughter, it’s just as complicated. Independence isn’t clean. It comes with contradictions. The desire to make your own choices sits alongside the need for reassurance, even if you’d never admit it out loud.

In a thriller, that contradiction can heighten every interaction. Arguments aren’t just about the immediate issue—they’re about identity, control, and who gets to define the truth.

What makes this dynamic particularly rich is that, underneath the conflict, there’s history. Shared experiences. In many cases, shared loss.

That emotional foundation means the tension never exists in isolation. Even at their most opposed, there’s still a connection holding them in place. That’s where the depth comes from. The arguments matter because the relationship matters.

It also shifts the emotional weight of the story. Instead of a breakdown between partners, you’re watching a relationship that can’t easily be walked away from.

A marriage might end. A mother–daughter bond doesn’t.

It stretches, it strains, but it remains. That persistence raises the stakes in a different way. Every decision risks not just immediate consequences, but long-term damage to something fundamental.

In modern thrillers, this kind of relationship opens up new possibilities. It brings in generational tension, changing ideas about identity and privacy, and the blurred line between childhood and adulthood. It allows for conflict that feels both intimate and inevitable.

And perhaps most importantly, it reflects something recognisable. Not in the specifics of any one story, but in the underlying dynamic: two people who know each other deeply, who love each other, and who still find themselves on opposite sides of the same truth.

In My Daughter Knows, this was exactly the space I wanted to sit in—the push and pull between a mother trying to hold things together and a daughter determined to define things on her own terms.

Kim comes from a world of control, messaging, and careful boundaries. Ruby exists in a world where expression is immediate, public, and often instinctive. Put them together, in the middle of grief, and the tension becomes constant.

What interested me most was that neither of them is entirely right, and neither of them is entirely wrong. Kim’s instinct to protect makes sense. Ruby’s instinct to question and express herself makes sense.

But those instincts don’t align, and that misalignment creates friction in every conversation, every decision, every moment where they’re forced to confront the same reality from completely different angles.

By shifting the focus from the more familiar husband–wife dynamic to a mother–daughter relationship, the story opens up a different kind of emotional pressure. One that feels less about separation and more about strain. Less about leaving, and more about what happens when you can’t.

That was the thread running through My Daughter Knows: two people who love each other, who are shaped by the same past, and who still find themselves pulling in opposite directions—each convinced they’re doing the right thing.

Get your copy.

Why Ruby Became My Favourite Character to Write in My Daughter Knows

Author Jon Cronshaw explains why Ruby from My Daughter Knows was one of his most enjoyable characters to write, highlighting her voice, humour, and emotional depth in this domestic thriller.

There’s always one character in a book who feels different on the page. Not easier, exactly—but more alive.

For me, in My Daughter Knows, that character was Ruby.

She arrived with a voice that didn’t need forcing. From her first lines, she knew exactly how she wanted to speak—quick, sharp, and just a little bit dangerous. She doesn’t wait for permission in a scene. She takes it over. That kind of character is a gift because it turns every interaction into something active. You’re not trying to make the scene work. You’re trying to keep up with her.

A lot of that comes from contrast. Ruby sits opposite a world that values control, discipline, and careful messaging. She’s none of those things. She says what she thinks, often before she’s fully processed it, and that creates friction in the best possible way. Every conversation has an edge. Every exchange feels like it could tip into something more.

She’s also funny. Not in a scripted way, but in the way people actually are when they’re trying to deflect, provoke, or just get a reaction. Some of my favourite lines in the book came from letting her push a moment too far, then watching the fallout. Humour becomes part of how she navigates the world, and part of how she keeps people at a distance.

At the same time, there’s something more going on beneath that surface. Ruby doesn’t present herself as vulnerable, but it’s there in the gaps—in what she avoids, in how she shifts a conversation, in the moments where the humour drops for just a second. Writing that balance between confidence and uncertainty made her feel real to me. She’s not one thing. She’s several, often at once.

What I enjoyed most was how she changes the temperature of a scene. Put her in a quiet moment and it won’t stay quiet for long. Put her in a tense one and she’ll either sharpen it or cut straight through it. She brings movement. Even when she’s sitting still, there’s a sense that something is about to happen.

She also reflects a different kind of world to the one I’ve written in before. Ruby understands attention—how it works, how it shifts, how quickly it can grow. She’s comfortable being seen in a way that other characters might resist. That perspective let me approach familiar themes from a new angle, without changing the tone of the story.

And if I’m honest, she surprised me more than any other character I’ve written in this genre. There were moments where I’d expect a scene to go one way, and she’d take it somewhere else entirely. Not for the sake of it, but because that’s who she is. She doesn’t behave to serve the plot. The plot has to adjust around her.

That’s why she stayed with me while I was writing—and why she’s lingered after. Characters like Ruby don’t just fill a role in a story. They push against it.

Get your copy.

Why I Made My Protagonist an MP: From Political Reporting to Writing My Daughter Knows

Author J. Cronshaw shares how his experience as a political reporter and communications officer shaped the decision to make the protagonist of My Daughter Knows an MP, blending public narrative with personal stakes.

When I set out to write My Daughter Knows, I knew the story needed a protagonist who lived under constant scrutiny.

Making Kim an MP wasn’t just a plot choice—it was a way to bring my own experience in political reporting and communications into the heart of the novel, where public narrative and private truth collide.

I wanted Kim to be an MP because it put her at the centre of two worlds that don’t sit comfortably together: the intensely personal and the relentlessly public.

Grief, when it happens, is messy and private and often wordless. Politics demands the opposite. It asks for clarity, structure, and a version of events that can be repeated on camera without hesitation.

That tension was the starting point for My Daughter Knows.

Before I started writing novels full time, I spent years as a political reporter. I sat in rooms not unlike the one Kim stands in at the Midland Hotel—press conferences where every word is chosen, every pause measured, every emotional beat carefully judged.

You learn very quickly that authenticity is often constructed. Not in a cynical way, necessarily, but in a disciplined one. There’s a rhythm to it. A way of telling a story that lands cleanly, that survives scrutiny, that gives journalists what they need while still protecting what you don’t want to say.

Later, working in communications for a shadow minister, I saw the same process from the other side. You’re not just reporting the story anymore—you’re shaping it. You think about headlines before they exist. You anticipate questions before they’re asked. You build a narrative that will hold under pressure, because you know it will be tested. And it always is.

That experience fed directly into Kim’s character. She isn’t just a grieving widow. She’s someone who understands how stories are built and how they travel. She knows how to stand at a lectern and turn something devastating into something purposeful. She knows how to pivot from the personal to the political in three sentences flat. That’s a skill. It’s also a defence mechanism.

Making her an MP allowed me to write about that duality in a way that felt grounded.

On one level, she’s doing something admirable—channelling loss into a campaign that might help other families. On another, she’s operating within a system that rewards control, message discipline, and emotional precision.

Those instincts don’t switch off when she goes home. They shape how she speaks to her daughter, how she handles conflict, how she processes what’s happened.

From my time in journalism, I also wanted to capture the way a story grows once it leaves the room. You can give a perfect statement, hit every note exactly as intended, and still find that the conversation moves in directions you didn’t expect.

Journalists ask reasonable questions that open doors. Audiences pick up on details and run with them. The narrative evolves, sometimes subtly, sometimes all at once.

That’s part of what interested me about placing Kim in this role. She’s used to being in control of the message. She’s used to understanding the machinery behind it.

But the world she’s operating in now—particularly the online space her daughter inhabits—doesn’t follow the same rules. It’s faster, less predictable, and far less forgiving.

There’s also something very human at the heart of it. As a reporter, you’re trained to ask questions. As a communications officer, you’re trained to manage them.

But as a parent, especially one dealing with loss, those instincts can clash. You want to protect. You want to guide. You want to keep things contained. And sometimes that comes at the cost of actually listening.

Kim being an MP let me put all of that on the page in a way that felt true to the world I’ve seen up close. The language, the rhythms, the quiet calculations happening behind the scenes—it all comes from those years of sitting in press rooms, drafting statements, and watching how stories take shape.

At its core, though, the decision was about pressure. Put a character in a position where the stakes are already high, then add something deeply personal and uncontrollable. See what holds. See what cracks. That’s where the story lives.

Get your copy.

My Daughter Knows Is Out Now – A Dark Domestic Thriller Set on the Lancashire Coast

My Daughter Knows is out now. A gripping domestic thriller set in Morecambe about a grieving mother, a hidden truth, and a daughter who starts asking the wrong questions.

My Daughter Knows is out now.

This is the one I’ve been building towards. A story rooted in grief, reputation, and the quiet pressure of a lie that refuses to stay buried.

It begins at the Midland Hotel in Morecambe. Cameras. Applause. A campaign built on tragedy. A woman who has turned the worst night of her life into something that looks like purpose.

But behind that version of events, there’s another truth.

One she hasn’t told anyone.

At the centre of the story is a mother navigating public scrutiny after her husband’s death in a hit-and-run. She’s pushing for change. Speaking to the press. Keeping everything controlled.

At home, things are different.

Her daughter is grieving in public. Posting. Questioning. Pulling at threads that were meant to stay hidden. When a new voice enters their lives—a therapist who seems to know exactly what to ask—those threads start to tighten.

This is a story about pressure. About the versions of ourselves we present to the world, and what happens when those versions begin to crack.

If you’ve read my previous thrillers, you’ll know I tend to focus on family dynamics, secrets, and the small decisions that spiral into something far larger. This book leans hard into that. It stays close. It keeps the tension personal.

And it doesn’t let go.

My Daughter Knows is available now in Kindle, paperback, and Kindle Unlimited.

If you like your thrillers grounded, unsettling, and driven by character, this one’s for you.

Get your Copy.

Read the Opening Chapter of My Daughter Knows – A Gripping Lancashire Domestic Thriller

Read the opening chapter of My Daughter Knows, a twist-packed domestic thriller set in Morecambe. A grieving MP, a dangerous secret, and a daughter who knows too much.

The curved windows of the Midland Hotel frame Morecambe Bay. The function room fills the way these rooms always fill: local press near the front, campaign supporters clustered by the exits, party staff lining the walls with their lanyards and their phones.

A banner stretches across the back wall. MICHAEL’S LAW. White text on navy. Fran chose the font. She said serif typefaces project seriousness. I said it looked like a funeral programme. She said that was the point.

The cameras sit in a row at the centre. BBC North West. ITV Granada. Bay Radio with their one microphone and the intern who always looks terrified. I clock each one without turning my head.

I settle my hands on the lectern. Breathe. Find the rhythm.

This is the version of myself I’ve spent six months building. The woman who turned the worst night of her life into something useful.

I open with Michael.

Not the crash. Not the road or the dark or the terrible specifics of what happened after. Just the absence. The phone that stopped ringing. The silence in a house that used to be full of someone else’s noise.

“Families like mine are left with unanswered questions,” I say. “Michael’s Law would ensure that no other family has to endure that silence.”

The pivot to policy comes three sentences after the personal note. Vehicle tracking systems. Data retention requirements. Accountability for drivers who flee the scene.

The room responds while I speak. Nodding campaigners in the front row. A woman I recognise from the road safety charity. Journalists writing in shorthand, phones recording from hip height. Everything lands where it should.

Then the pause.

I’ve rehearsed this. The moment where my voice softens and the room goes still. I mention Michael’s name again, and let the space around it do the work.

“Michael believed in community. In looking out for the people around you.” My voice drops half a register. “He’d have hated all this fuss. He’d have told me to stop making speeches and go home and read a good book.”

Scattered laughter. A few people leaning back in their chairs, shoulders loosening. Affectionate, human, real.

It is real. That part I don’t have to manufacture. Michael would have hated this. He’d have been leaning against the back wall making faces at me until I cracked.

The ache behind my ribs tightens. I let just enough of it reach my face—the slight break in composure, timed to the second.

I close on the bill. Michael’s death will mean something. This law will pass.

Applause rolls through the ballroom.

Camera flashes strobe from the press row. Hands reach towards me as I step sideways from the lectern.

“When will the bill be introduced?” a woman from ITV asks.

“Spring session. We’re in consultation now.”

A man from the radio raises a hand. “Cross-party support?”

“Growing. I’ve had encouraging conversations on both sides.”

“Have police made any progress on the investigation?” the woman from ITV asks.

My chest tightens.

“The investigation remains open. We continue to hope for answers.”

I shake hands along the front row, offering the brief, camera-ready smile Fran drilled into me during my first selection campaign.

Then Fran appears in my periphery, holding my phone at waist height. The angle says urgent. Her jaw says don’t react yet.

I excuse myself from a road safety campaigner mid-handshake and cross towards the corridor that leads to the hotel entrance.

Fran holds the phone out. “Before you get in the car.”

I take the phone and watch.

The video shows Ruby walking down the drive outside our house. Casual, chatty, phone held at arm’s length. The angle is terrible—not in terms of framing, Ruby’s framing is always good—but in terms of what it reveals. The front wall. The driveway gate. The recycling bins with our house number visible. A clear view of the street beyond, enough to identify us on Google Maps in thirty seconds.

Every loosened muscle from the press event locks back into place.

MPs attract attention from people who should not have your address. I’ve had letters that required police involvement. A man turned up at my constituency office last year convinced I was stealing his pension. Ruby has just handed every unstable stranger on the internet a map to our front door.

I don’t say anything to Fran. I take the phone and walk towards the car.

Outside, the cold off the bay cuts through the residual heat still clinging to my jacket. Salt and damp. Gulls wheel above the hotel roof.

I call Ruby before the car door shuts behind me.

She answers on the fourth ring. “Mum, what’s up?”

“Take the video down.”

“Mum, chill. It’s literally just me walking.”

“Take it down, Ruby. People can see the house.”

“So? No one cares where we live.”

“I care. Take it down.”

“You care because it doesn’t look good. Everything’s always about how things look.”

“This isn’t about appearances. This is about safety.”

“Whose safety? Mine or your career’s?”

“Ruby—”

“Because I’m pretty sure you didn’t ring this fast when I actually needed you last month.”

My hand tightens on the phone. Last month, the college called about Ruby’s attendance and I was in a Select Committee meeting and didn’t pick up until evening. Ruby has weaponised it ever since.

“Stop being ridiculous and take it down.”

“Don’t call me ridiculous.”

“Then don’t act—”

“What? Don’t act like my father just died? Don’t act like I’m grieving? Or just don’t act like it where people can see?”

Neither of us speaks. Neither of us expected that.

Ruby’s breathing steadies on the line.

“Fine,” she says. “I’ll take it down.”

“Thank you.”

“But not because you told me to.”

The call ends. No goodbye. Just the dead click of Ruby making sure I know she’s doing this on her terms.

I sit in the back seat, phone in my lap. Fran slips in beside me and eases the door shut.

“She’ll take it down,” I say.

Fran nods. She doesn’t push. She never pushes after one of these calls. That’s what makes her good at this—she knows when to wait.

The car pulls away from the Midland. The bay stretches grey beyond the promenade.

“Ruby’s struggling,” Fran says. “She’s grieving and she’s doing it the way her generation does. Publicly.”

The tide has drawn halfway to Grange, exposing dark sand and standing water.

“She needs someone to talk to,” Fran says. “Someone who isn’t you.”

“She won’t see a therapist. I’ve tried.”

“Not an ordinary therapist.” Fran shifts in her seat. “Have you heard of Dr Harry Charles?”

The name registers somewhere distant. A face on morning television. A calm voice between sofa cushions and coffee mugs, talking about grief or trauma or something I half-watched while getting dressed for work.

“The TV one?”

“Clinical psychologist. Trauma specialist. He’s done a book, TED talks, all the documentary panels. Very credible. Very visible.”

“And you think Ruby would talk to him?”

“I think Ruby would talk to someone she’s already seen on her phone. He’s not some stranger from a GP referral list. He’s someone she might actually find interesting.”

“Ruby doesn’t engage. Ruby fights.”

“Then frame it differently. Not therapy. A conversation with someone impressive.”

Ruby hates being told what to do. She’s rejected every attempt at structure since Michael died—revision plans, university open days, family dinners that last longer than twelve minutes. But she responds to novelty. To attention. To anyone who treats her like she’s interesting rather than broken.

“She’ll say no,” I say.

“Maybe.”

The car turns onto the coast road. Stone houses give way to the long flat stretch of the promenade. The Eric Morecambe statue grins at tourists who aren’t there.

I call Ruby again. My thumb hovers over her name. I brace for another round.

She answers calmly this time. Whatever passed between us has cooled, or she wants me to think it has.

“Fran mentioned a therapist. Dr Harry Charles. Would you—”

“Yeah, yeah. I’ve already looked him up.”

“You’ve…what?”

“After Fran mentioned it last week. I googled him. He’s done TED talks and everything. That book about grief—people in the comments were recommending it.”

I glance at Fran. Her expression stays neutral.

“The sessions might actually be useful,” Ruby says. “Apparently he’s really good with grief and family stuff.”

“So you’ll try it?”

“Yeah. I’ll try it.” A pause. “Why not?”

Get your copy.

Teachers as Villains in Domestic Thrillers: When Trust Becomes the Greatest Threat

Why are teachers such effective villains in domestic thrillers? A look at chilling novels by Freida McFadden, Koren Zailckas, Zoë Heller, Muriel Spark, and J. Cronshaw.

Teachers occupy a position of automatic trust within families and communities.

They are granted access to children, private information, and emotional authority without question.

Domestic thrillers exploit this trust by placing danger inside an institution designed to protect.

When a teacher becomes the antagonist, the threat feels intimate, sanctioned, and terrifyingly plausible.

These novels use classrooms, staff rooms, and school gates as pressure points where power can be abused behind polite façades.

The Drama Teacher – Koren Zailckas

Gracie Mueller returns to deception when financial pressure threatens her carefully built life.

As a drama teacher, she operates in a space where performance is expected, allowing her to control how others see her.

The role grants trust and access, masking the instincts she once relied on to survive.

As her past pushes back in, the danger lies in how long the performance can hold.

Get your copy.

The Teacher – Freida McFadden

Eve’s life appears orderly and controlled, built on routine, respectability, and trust.

The scandal at Caseham High lingers beneath the surface, centred on a student everyone claims to understand.

As perspectives shift, certainty erodes, and the lines between victim and manipulator begin to blur.

In a world where authority is assumed to be safe, the real danger lies in believing the wrong person.

Get your copy.

Notes on a Scandal – Zoë Heller

A student–teacher affair sits at the centre, but the real menace comes from the observing colleague who narrates the story.

Barbara’s quiet, resentful fixation turns her into something far more controlling than the scandal itself.

The classroom becomes secondary to the psychological manipulation unfolding behind it.

Trust erodes not through violence, but through obsession disguised as concern.

Get your copy.

The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie – Muriel Spark

Miss Brodie positions herself as an inspirational teacher, shaping her students into a chosen inner circle.

Her influence extends beyond education into ideology, identity, and control.

What begins as mentorship slowly reveals itself as manipulation with long-term consequences.

The threat lies in how easily authority becomes indoctrination.

Get Your Copy.

The Teacher – J. Cronshaw

Daniel Craven arrives as the ideal teacher—calm, dependable, and instantly trusted by everyone around him.

His presence settles naturally into the family’s life, strengthening bonds while quietly reshaping them.

Isabel is the only one who sees the pattern forming, but her warnings are dismissed as paranoia.

The danger lies in how easily authority becomes access, and how quickly trust silences suspicion.

Get your copy.

Why Teachers Work So Well as Antagonists

Teachers are trained to manage behaviour, narratives, and trust.

They are accustomed to being believed.

Their authority is reinforced by institutions parents rely on daily.

Domestic thrillers use this imbalance to generate fear without spectacle.

When the threat wears a staff badge and a reassuring smile, escape feels impossible.

Note: This post includes affiliate links.

Interview with J. Cronshaw About Officially Dead | NewInBooks Author Interview

Read J. Cronshaw’s NewInBooks interview about the inspiration behind Officially Dead, his domestic thriller writing process, and the dark secrets that drive his stories.

I recently had the pleasure of being interviewed by the team at NewInBooks, where I talked about my latest psychological thriller, Officially Dead, and the ideas behind the story.

In the interview I discuss how my background as a court reporter inspired the premise.

One of the strange realities of the British legal system is the Declaration of Presumed Death—a document issued when someone has been missing for seven years. Legally, they are declared dead.

That idea stuck with me for years.

What would it feel like for a family to reach that point? What secrets might surface once someone is officially gone?

Those questions eventually became the foundation for Officially Dead.

During the interview I also talk about the themes behind the novel, the kinds of stories I enjoy writing, and the music that captures the tension between the characters.

If you’d like a behind-the-scenes look at the book and my writing process, you can read the full interview here:

👉 newinbooks.com/interview-with-j-cronshaw-author-of-officially-dead

I’m really grateful to the NewInBooks team for featuring the book and taking the time to ask such thoughtful questions.

If you enjoy psychological and domestic thrillers filled with secrets, tension, and twists, I think you’ll find the conversation interesting.

And if you haven’t yet read Officially Dead, now might be a good time to add it to your reading list.

read officially dead.

Officially Dead by J. Cronshaw: Opening Chapter | British Domestic Thriller Set in Morecambe

Read the opening chapter of Officially Dead, a gripping British domestic thriller by J. Cronshaw. A missing daughter declared dead after seven years. A grieving marriage under strain. And a message that suggests someone is lying. Perfect for fans of tense psychological suspense and dark family secrets.

The car park at Morecambe Cricket Club is half-full by the time I pull in, vehicles clustered near the entrance in that awkward way people park when they don’t want to be the first to arrive but don’t want to seem late either.

Graham’s van sits at the far end, beneath the sycamore where the sodium light doesn’t quite reach. He always parks there. Away from door dings, he says. Away from prying eyes, I think, though I’ve never said it aloud.

I kill the engine and sit for a moment longer than I should.

Through the clubhouse windows, silhouettes move against the yellow glow. Someone laughs—I can’t hear it from here, but I can see the head tilt back, the shoulders shake. Too loud for a memorial. Too normal.

The taste of gin still coats the back of my throat from the swig I took in the driveway before I reversed out, and I tell myself it was just to settle my nerves, just one, just enough to get through the door.

Holly would have hated this. Fifteen years old and already rolling her eyes at “club people,” at the men who propped up the bar talking about spin bowls and silly mid-off, at the wives who smiled too hard and watched each other’s waistlines. I can see her now, bracelets clacking as she pushed through the door, already planning her escape.

I check my reflection in the rear-view mirror and arrange my face into something appropriate. Grieving but coping. Sad but grateful. If anyone asks how I am, I’ll say I’m taking it one day at a time, because that’s what people want to hear.

The smell hits me first: lager, old carpet, the cloying sweetness of air freshener fighting a losing battle against decades of cigarette smoke that seeped into the walls before the ban. A television mutters in the corner, volume low, and someone’s turned off the fruit machine for once, which I suppose counts as respect.

The memorial table sits just inside the door, positioned so you can’t avoid it.

Holly’s school photo watches me from a silver frame, that awful one from Year Ten where they made her take off her jewellery and she sulked for a week afterwards. Battery-powered tealights flicker around it, and someone’s laid a bouquet across the white tablecloth with a ribbon that reads Forever 15 in curling gold script.

There’s a guestbook open to a half-filled page, a pen on a string, and a stack of printed orders of service with the words I’ve been avoiding for seven years.

Declaration of Presumed Death.

That’s what the coroner’s letter said. That’s what Graham showed the neighbours, the solicitor, the life insurance company. Holly Renee Henshaw declared dead in absence. A legal term for what happens when there’s no body but everyone’s stopped looking.

After seven years, Holly is officially dead.

My fingers catch on the edge of the guestbook as I reach for the pen, and I can’t make myself write. Not yet. The photograph is wrong, I think. The wrong smile, the wrong Holly—the one who sat still for cameras instead of the one who ran through the house trailing scarves and chaos.

Graham’s voice cuts through the room, warm and measured, and I turn to see him shaking hands with Dave Pointer from three doors down. His shoulders are set at exactly the right angle: open but not casual, strong but not stiff. He’s wearing the charcoal suit I picked out for him six years ago, and someone’s already told him he’s bearing up well. I can see it in the way Dave claps his arm.

Brave. That’s what they’ll call him. Strong.

I’m the one they’ll watch.

“She’s in a better place.” The woman saying it has a new haircut, blonder than last month, and she keeps glancing past me towards the bar.

I nod and say thank you.

“At least you’ve got closure now.” This one’s from a man I half-recognise, someone’s husband, someone’s brother. He says closure the way you’d say receipt, like it’s something I can fold up and file away.

I nod and say thank you.

A cricket club regular whose name I should know grips my hand too hard and tells me Graham’s handled everything wonderfully, really wonderfully, and then launches into a story about Holly as a toddler at the summer fête. She knocked over a whole table of raffle prizes, apparently. Sent bottles rolling everywhere. He laughs at the memory, and I try to place myself there, to remember the weight of her in my arms, but the details have gone soft around the edges.

“Excuse me,” I say. “I should—”

I don’t finish the sentence. I don’t have to.

The bar is three steps away, and I order a gin and tonic before I’ve properly stopped walking. The barman pours without comment. I wrap my fingers around the glass and the cold bites into my palm, sharp and clean, and I take the first sip standing right there at the counter because I don’t trust myself to carry it without spilling.

Behind me, the room hums and murmurs. I catch the shape of my name in someone’s mouth, the slight dip in volume when I turn around. I’m imagining it. I’m always imagining it.

Except I see the look anyway, from a woman near the window. That quick flick of the eyes towards my glass. That tightening of the mouth that says still drinking.

I order a second before the first is finished and tell myself it’s for Graham, even though I won’t give it to him.

Across the room, he laughs at something. Too soft. Too normal.

Graham’s always had a gift for rooms.

He moves through the crowd like he belongs to each conversation, refilling cups of tea without being asked, remembering names I’ve long forgotten, asking after children and jobs and ailing parents with just the right amount of concern. When he passes me, his hand finds the small of my back, guiding me gently towards a quieter corner, and to anyone watching it looks like tenderness.

I know better. He’s steering me away from the bar.

“You’re doing so well,” Lynne Carver says, appearing at his elbow with her hand already reaching for his arm. Her nails are new, coral pink, and her perfume is strong enough to taste. “Both of you. I don’t know how you cope.”

“One day at a time,” Graham says, and his smile is soft and sad and perfectly calibrated. “She’d hate all this fuss.”

Lynne laughs, dabbing at her eyes, and I stand there with my gin and my silence and my arranged face. She’d hate all this fuss. He says it like he knew her. Like he understood her. But I hear the edge beneath: don’t make a scene.

My stomach tightens. Not grief, exactly. Something older.

Two more women stop to touch his arm before he finishes his tea, and I watch their fingers linger on his sleeve, their heads tilt towards his. They’re comforting him, I tell myself. It’s natural. It’s normal.

I tell myself a lot of things.

Graham’s phone buzzes against the table, and his hand moves to cover it before I can see the screen.

“Back in a minute,” he says, already standing. “Dave wants a word about the extension quote.”

He crosses the room, angling himself towards the side door where the corridor leads to the toilets and the fire exit. I track the set of his shoulders, the deliberate way he doesn’t look back. He’s not heading towards Dave. Dave’s at the bar, laughing with the treasurer.

Graham disappears around the corner, and I count the seconds. Ten. Twenty. I finish my drink and the ice clinks too loud in the empty glass.

His phone sits on the table where he left it, face down, next to his car keys and a crumpled order of service. He must have set it down when he stood up. Must have forgotten.

Except Graham doesn’t forget. Not things like that.

I shouldn’t look. I know exactly how the conversation will go if I look—the sighing disappointment, the patient explanation about trust and privacy, the quiet reminder that I’ve been drinking and I’m not thinking clearly. I’ve had this argument before. I’ve lost it before.

My hand moves anyway. Hovers over the phone without touching it.

The screen lights up.

Can’t wait to see you later x

The words burn bright in the dim room, white text on a grey bubble, and then the screen goes dark again.

I don’t breathe. The room shrinks to the size of that phone, that message, that single letter at the end. X. A kiss. An intimacy. A promise.

The sender’s name was there for half a second, maybe less. A first name I didn’t catch. Or didn’t recognise. Or my brain refused to hold because holding it would mean something I’m not ready to mean.

My pulse thuds in my ears. The gin turns sour in my stomach.

It could be anyone. A mate from work, taking the piss. His brother, though his brother never signs off with kisses. Someone about a job, a quote, a pickup time. It could be nothing. It could be completely innocent, and I’m sitting here in a room full of people who came to mourn my daughter, turning a text message into something it isn’t.

Across the room, Graham laughs. Closer now. Coming back.

Holly’s photograph watches from the memorial table. Forever 15.

I move the phone back to exactly where it was, screen down, edge aligned with his keys. My hand finds my glass, empty but present, something to grip while I arrange my face into neutral. When Graham rounds the corner, I’m studying the order of service like I’ve never seen it before.

“You alright?” He slides back into the seat beside me, checking the phone with a glance so quick I almost miss it.

“Fine.” I keep my voice level. “Just—a lot.”

He nods, and his hand covers mine on the table, warm and dry and deliberate. “She’d be proud, you know. The turnout. Everyone who came.”

I look at his fingers wrapped around my knuckles and think about the last time he held my hand where anyone could see it. I can’t remember.

“We should head off soon,” he says. “You look tired.”

There it is. The suggestion dressed as concern. The lid sliding into place over my mouth.

I nod and say yes, soon, just a few more minutes. I don’t ask about the text. I don’t ask about Dave’s extension. I’ve learned what questions cost in this house.

But I watch him accept another handshake, another murmured condolence, another touch on the arm. I watch him play the grieving father with the same steady grace he brings to everything.

And I wonder who can’t wait to see him later.

Get your copy.